Loading...

Loading...
Bad schema decisions are the most expensive mistakes in software — they're invisible until the data volume grows, and by then a fix means a migration under production load. We design schemas for correctness first: proper normalization, constraints that actually constrain, and indexes chosen from real query patterns instead of guesswork.
We work in both relational (PostgreSQL) and document (MongoDB) databases, using Prisma, SQLAlchemy, or Mongoose depending on the stack, and pick the model that fits your data — not whichever database happens to be trendy. For existing systems, we also do schema audits: finding the N+1 queries, missing indexes, and denormalization decisions that are quietly costing you performance.
By the shape of your data and how it's queried. Highly relational data with strict consistency needs points to PostgreSQL. Flexible, nested, or rapidly evolving schemas often fit MongoDB better. We've built production systems on both and don't default to either.
Yes — this is common work for us. We look at slow query logs, index coverage, and schema shape, then hand back a prioritized list of fixes, from quick index additions to structural changes worth planning for.
Yes, including migrations from spreadsheets, older SQL databases, and no-code tools. We script migrations to be repeatable and reversible, so a bad migration doesn't mean data loss.
Tell us what you're building — we'll help you architect it right the first time.